 |
|
View Poll Results: Do you think Science and Religion can be Compatible?
|
|
Yes, Science can be Compatible with Religion.
|
 
|
26 |
76.47% |
|
No, Science cannot be compatible with Religion.
|
 
|
7 |
20.59% |
|
I don't know.
|
 
|
1 |
2.94% |
|
I don't CARE!
|
 
|
0 |
0% |
 |
Science vs. Religion ? |
 |
September 30th, 2007, 01:28 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Afro Resident
Resident
Mr. Muhammad is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Planet Asia
Posts: 131
Thanks: 12
Thanked 25 Times in 14 Posts
Rep Power: 0
|
Science vs. Religion ?
Is Science compatible with Religion?
What do you think, and WHY?
RM
__________________
"Let him, who would see God, Look in the Mirror."
|
|
|
|
 |
Creation vs. Evolution |
 |
September 30th, 2007, 01:33 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Afro Resident
Resident
Mr. Muhammad is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Planet Asia
Posts: 131
Thanks: 12
Thanked 25 Times in 14 Posts
Rep Power: 0
|
Creation vs. Evolution
How Did the Universe Come to Exist?
Was it by Creation? ...or, by Evolution?
What is your position, and WHY?
RM
__________________
"Let him, who would see God, Look in the Mirror."
|
|
|
|
September 30th, 2007, 02:08 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Afro Resident
poeticasylum1 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 657
Thanks: 24
Thanked 243 Times in 134 Posts
Rep Power: 35
|
I believe that science helps man to understand God's creation. Though there are scientists who do not believe in God, God in His love for man allows man to peek at His wonders.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to poeticasylum1 For This Useful Post:
|
|
September 30th, 2007, 02:31 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Founder
DBlack is offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 7,564
Thanks: 330
Thanked 1,330 Times in 718 Posts
Rep Power: 192
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Muhammad
Is Science compatible with Religion?
What do you think, and WHY?
RM
|
It's your topic, what do you think?
I think science and religion can be compatible, but that would really depend on the religion and the segment of science in collision/exchange with each other.
The key component is man and his ability to interpret.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DBlack For This Useful Post:
|
|
September 30th, 2007, 04:17 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Afro Resident
Gorilla is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 996
Thanks: 53
Thanked 106 Times in 76 Posts
Rep Power: 28
|
I personally see science and religion trying to ultimately answer two entirely different set of questions. I find people just like to steer them into one another for the sake of contention rather than the constructive growth of either.
|
|
|
|
September 30th, 2007, 06:03 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Afro Resident
robbboy2003 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Biblically referenced City far away
Posts: 1,663
Thanks: 852
Thanked 382 Times in 261 Posts
Rep Power: 38
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DBlack
It's your topic, what do you think?
I think science and religion can be compatible, but that would really depend on the religion and the segment of science in collision/exchange with each other.
The key component is man and his ability to interpret.
|
I think if the spirit,or intentions of the scientist is there. The two can be compatible.
Off topic a little. DBlack is this Jill Scott's new record you have for the avatar.
Peace! Oh cuze i want her. Her album of course.
__________________
"Love her constantly,consistently,and with concern."
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
September 30th, 2007, 06:37 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Afro Resident
The Dragon is offline
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Around the way
Posts: 1,765
Thanks: 609
Thanked 513 Times in 380 Posts
Rep Power: 56
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gorilla
I personally see science and religion trying to ultimately answer two entirely different set of questions. I find people just like to steer them into one another for the sake of contention rather than the constructive growth of either.
|
I disagree with what is said here because our ancestors used science to understand God. This is how they came to the conclusion that there was a "higher force" at work in them and in their immediate enviornments in the first place.
They observed natural phenonmena such as the sun rising every morning as awesome (not to mention all of the benefits they got from this), they observed such natural phenomena as the change in whether, the vast oceans and seas, etc. as something they knew they had absolutely no control over.
They believed that something ultimately did control all of this, something much more powerfull then these aspects of nature.
They realized that all of this was apart of something greater and consumated a "whole"; They took the pieces of the whole and began to study it and then reconnect it back with the whole. This is science and ultimately how they came to a conclusion of an all powerfull force we now know of as "God."
You cannot separate science from "God" and really make any kind of sense.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to The Dragon For This Useful Post:
|
|
September 30th, 2007, 07:20 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Afro Resident
The Dragon is offline
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Around the way
Posts: 1,765
Thanks: 609
Thanked 513 Times in 380 Posts
Rep Power: 56
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Muhammad
How Did the Universe Come to Exist?
Was it by Creation? ...or, by Evolution?
What is your position, and WHY?
RM
|
Creation and evolution go hand in hand. Really can't separate the two if we have a true understanding of both.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to The Dragon For This Useful Post:
|
|
September 30th, 2007, 11:38 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Afro Resident
Resident
Mr. Muhammad is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Planet Asia
Posts: 131
Thanks: 12
Thanked 25 Times in 14 Posts
Rep Power: 0
|
Yall wanna see white folks go "ape sh**"? Go to Yahoo! Answers, and just "suggest" that atheism is flawed...and watch the response....lol.
Thank you to everyone who responded.
RM
__________________
"Let him, who would see God, Look in the Mirror."
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
September 30th, 2007, 05:04 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Afro Resident
Gorilla is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 996
Thanks: 53
Thanked 106 Times in 76 Posts
Rep Power: 28
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dragon
I disagree with what is said here because our ancestors used science to understand God. This is how they came to the conclusion that there was a "higher force" at work in them and in their immediate enviornments in the first place.
They observed natural phenonmena such as the sun rising every morning as awesome (not to mention all of the benefits they got from this), they observed such natural phenomena as the change in whether, the vast oceans and seas, etc. as something they knew they had absolutely no control over.
They believed that something ultimately did control all of this, something much more powerfull then these aspects of nature.
They realized that all of this was apart of something greater and consumated a "whole"; They took the pieces of the whole and began to study it and then reconnect it back with the whole. This is science and ultimately how they came to a conclusion of an all powerfull force we now know of as "God."
You cannot separate science from "God" and really make any kind of sense.
|
Science seeks to see how things are ordered and maintained in order. Asserting who or what ordered them seems like it would rely on the personal beliefs of the person who is observing. It may influence how they view existence seeing all of these ordered things, but Science still makes sense without a religious or spiritual belief. To be able to separate it from all of these things with systematic methodology, Science is given a grounded position in what is observable. Anything else claiming to be Science is really just a pseudo-science with some sort of bias, agenda or just the reseult of bad science.
The limitations of understanding the whole self-similar "system" leave holes that could be investigated further through another means of thought, because Science can only answer perceived and testable tangible components of reality. It does not seek to answer all questions.
Science gives one a lot of things to think about, but its up to that person to draw their own extraneous conclusions.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Gorilla For This Useful Post:
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:10 AM. |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |