Who would you Vote for in '08 Election?

[DBlack]

Originally Posted by Sasori

God hasn't or has ever taken sides in a government's politics. Involving the religious into it is similar to what Bush has done with his fundamental zealots and you see how well that worked out.

Religion should have no part in the political decisions of a nation

Too many of us still don't understand that Religion and Politics don't mix.

I can forgive Obama's life of drug addiction and crime, but I can't elect him to be president. Common sense and moral convictions rule the day.

[SchoolofSoul]

Originally Posted by Istlota

I am more inclined to think that God wants nothing to do with American politics.

Not just American politics, politics anywhere on the planet. God simply isn't concerned with the world's political systems, because they're of the world and not His Kingdom. To think He would be is silly; it's like thinking God cares whether you wear the red shirt or the green shirt with those pants.

[Sasori]

Originally Posted by DBlack

Put a little intelligence into your desire for change. What change do you want? You don't even know. Picking a candidate purely for the sake of changing is retarded, because you don't even know what you are changing to. Do you?

You know why its so easy for you and others to talk about Clinton, Edwards, Bush, INSTEAD of Obama? It's because OBAMA hasn't done anything significant in his life for which you can render intelligent judgement.

This ain't about Clinton. YOu want to cherry pick Clinton, have at it. How about putting our brother under the same critical microscope and see what you come up with.

We can't, as stated already and you should know, his agenda isn't known. His programs aren't known, his voting record is only alittle over 50%, and unfortunately, the only candidate worth voting for in the democratic party at this point.

So answer your own question as we already know this as a answer, this is the change up candidate being supplied to us as Americans, a solution to the previous ills of the last president, it is an endless cycle in which it has.

You have me confused or have my post confused. This was to answer ezekielscall_2's question.

[natirnr]

The only non Illuminati candidate,
like someone posted before, Obama is CFR no matter how much he butters your biscuit!

[Sasori]

Originally Posted by DBlack

Too many of us still don't understand that Religion and Politics don't mix.

I can forgive Obama's life of drug addiction and crime, but I can't elect him to be president. Common sense and moral convictions rule the day.

True and agreed

But with that... your current choice? It's not like we could submit Donald Duck as a write in, and choosing an independant during the election would only split the vote and guarantee another Republican President...

[Sasori]

Originally Posted by natirnr

The only non Illuminati candidate,
like someone posted before, Obama is CFR no matter how much he butters your biscuit!

But Ms. Mckinney wouldn't get in for the simple fact that the votes during the election would split and elect another Republican

Plus, YT isn't going to forgive her for telling the truth despite the spin doctors

[SchoolofSoul]

Originally Posted by natirnr

The only non Illuminati candidate,
like someone posted before, Obama is CFR no matter how much he butters your biscuit!

While I personally like Cynthia McKinney, she's been written off as a nutbar/troublemaker by far too much of the total population at large. The likelihood of her even being considered as a valid Presidential candidate is extremely low.

[natirnr]

Originally Posted by Sasori

But Ms. Mckinney wouldn't get in for the simple fact that the votes during the election would split and elect another Republican

Plus, YT isn't going to forgive her for telling the truth despite the spin doctors

Fromwhat you say whites will vote against Obama, (Dems voting Repub) just to keep pure white blood in the Big House

[natirnr]

Originally Posted by SchoolofSoul

While I personally like Cynthia McKinney, she's been written off as a nutbar/troublemaker by far too much of the total population at large. The likelihood of her even being considered as a valid Presidential candidate is extremely low.

Brother you are absoutely right, the CFR may have put Obama there to insure racial polarization and a Republican win,
as I said, no one has mentioned the Voting Rights Act wich expires this year, o wether the computer voting machines are finally tamper proof.

[DBlack]

Originally Posted by Sasori

We can't, as stated already and you should know, his agenda isn't known. His programs aren't known, his voting record is only alittle over 50%, and unfortunately, the only candidate worth voting for in the democratic party at this point.

So answer your own question as we already know this as a answer, this is the change up candidate being supplied to us as Americans, a solution to the previous ills of the last president, it is an endless cycle in which it has.

You have me confused or have my post confused. This was to answer ezekielscall_2's question.

No shyt! You walked right in to the obvious conclusion: If one has no record, no history of that you wish to employ him for, why would anyone be so intellectually void by forcing themselves to conclude the opposite?!!! This isn't a crap shoot, nor is it Vegas.