Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesfrmphilly
prior to the civil rights movement those rights were not so "inalienable". i may well be old and stupid but i do know that wrestling over semantics is the purview of the protected and the privileged.
you said i didn't know what pessimism was. i asked you to explain it to us. now you say i don't know what civil rights are. i ask you to explain it to us.
and bye the way, where were you in 1964 and 1968? i was fighting for something, i know not what.
|
Pessimissm; Read it yourself.
You simply don't know what you are talking about. 99% of your conversation is in the form of asking questions and deflecting. Obviously, when it comes to english and history, you and I went to two different schools. What inalienable is defined by God, not by man. I just gave you a push in the right direction, now go read and learn on your own.
In your world, your define it by what whites think, hence your perverse view of just about everything. And you wonder why you are lost.
I was born in 67, so I was hardly in the position to fight. But I bet I did more as a baby shyttin my clothes then you've done your whole life. Look at you; a fraud in the worse way, your cloak revealed every time you post. Only thing you were probably fighting for is a better position in the soup line with the rest of the UncleToms of that generation. Those who fought during that time, don't have the stomach for licking the boots of whitey, whereas you find it a mainstay in your cognitive diet.
No wonder you love Obama so much, both of you talk a good game, but have nothing to show for it. Yet, you are so quick to blame white folk for many of our problems, when you won't even use the God given talent and inalienable rights you have.