View Single Post

 
Old January 4th, 2008, 12:54 AM   #30 (permalink)
Sasori
Afro Resident
Emerging Voice
 
Sasori's Avatar
 
Sasori is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 360
Thanks: 10
Thanked 79 Times in 58 Posts
Sasori is a splendid one to beholdSasori is a splendid one to beholdSasori is a splendid one to beholdSasori is a splendid one to beholdSasori is a splendid one to beholdSasori is a splendid one to beholdSasori is a splendid one to behold
Rep Power: 12
Credits: 2,060
Quote:
Originally Posted by afrocentric View Post
aint that a blip!!!! i bet you wouldn't say that if it was a yt women grabbing all his golds. you do see most of the atheltics have mixed or yt women on their shoulders talking bout they love them. and they(yt women) are the first to holla divorce, get the highest lawyer they could find to gather up paternity suits, child support, alimonies, half the house, the cars, and the dog. and you wanna say that this sista is greedy!!!


how many athelics do you see armed up with a black sista? it aint that many.
Please, scum is scum regardless of color, and I hold color no different than the rest. A gold digger of any color is still one who digs for gold. You are making it of color, not I

And who says a black woman hasn't gotten those riches as well? There have been plenty of concubines in the news who currently live a good life through their offspring, and still want more... Kim Porter comes to mind as well as the rest of Puff's line of baby mothers.

Plus, it isn't my fault these dudes pick other than black women, that is their issue, not mine

Quote:
how do you know? you live with him? just because he said it don't make it true. he could say anything just so he don't look like the bad guy.
It is called record of payment which is submitted in the case for paternity and most requested during child support cases. It is the proof of the non-custodial parent to supply so it could be calculated into the case.

Plus, the condo was under his name but not his chief residence. It was purchased especially for her.

Quote:
so what!.... thats chump change to him. he probably spent more than that on his cars. if he could avoid paying the bill then dam it he can avoid paying the child support.
So now we are going to ignore the fact that even if he paid in excess of $5,000 a month for his son in the beginning of his life and gets no credit for [since not only it is what he should've done, but it was a lie when she said she still has to pay on it]. He is not avoiding paying it at all, he has given support and says he will pay support for his child, he is simply not supporting her and her search for a labor free lifestyle

Quote:
so what if she did. don't nobody know why she moved out and moved in with her parents. how do we know he didn't bring some floosy up in the place while she was gone or whatever and she found out about it? or maybe he threaten her to get out of HIS condo.
I answered this above, but will say again, the condo was is not his chief residence. It was purchased [as property records state and also submitted] for her when she was pregnant. Your example would mean that instead of taking the woman to his mansion... you take her to your future baby momma's house? Come on now, that is grasping at straws and trying to find an excuse for her.

Simply put, she thought and hoped that she would be a wife, they had sex, she got pregnant, realized she wasn't number 1, currently seeking ways to get back at him as well as secure her out.

This could be seen when she moved out of the condo. It is made to reduce her current holdings in the effort to gain more money through child support. If the judge already sees she is in adequate lodging, the amount the child would recieve for support would reduce due to said child's dwelling.

Which means... she, like her white and latina counterparts who take to this behavior, submit to activities which are gold-diggerish, even if it is done out of spite.

As I said before, I am for the child support system, the children should not suffer financially due to the reduced revenue garnered by single parent households. I also wished they made it mandatory for the father to stay in the child's life, but this only deals with finances. On the other hand, the single parent also has to make sure she has a solid foundation under her through her own resources, for as the definition used by law states, it is for the welfare of the child, not the convenience and welfare of the custodian... that happens as collateral and not their right. If they wanted a meal ticket, she should've MARRIED the dude and then had the child so she could get alimony... for that is for the spouse

Last edited by Sasori : January 4th, 2008 at 12:59 AM.
  Reply With Quote