[amilcarkabral]

I searched your links, all of them are Tomfoolery . . . intellectual slight of hand to distract us from solving real-immediate issues like the dis-integration of the black family and the lack of knowledge and know-how of business-building in the black community.

But, in terms of the "Amero"

First off, most of your references are outdated ('06 and '01). And your youtube reverence has some semi-cook asserting its existence with the commentator completely unawares, it's not like it was an intense discussion with congresspeople, AND, it was a cat from london, not someone from our side of 'the pond' who has traveled the inner circles of american planning. Your canadian 'newspaper' references were from decidedly conspiracy-theorist papers and anti-american papers who weren't reporting on actual plans, but attempting to prevent positive speculation.

Second, you don't factor in that Americans have a 'superiority' complex in their national identity that would create a severe backlash from rural gun-toting 'patriots' who would be vehemently opposed to the integration of the currency. I cite the whole debate on immigration.

Third, there was no singular dominant economy like the US in Europe that proposed or opposed the Euro. Canada and Mexico have economies that are about the size of California's or smaller, making the US an unassailable powerhouse. Europe's economy was already heavily integrated with cross-border travel facilitated by a top-of-the line high-speed train network that allowed for business-class travel within Europe that surpasses the cross-state travel in the NE metropolis from Boston to NY. The creation of the Euro served more to be an after-the-fact recognition of heavy integration than a plan for integration, a good metaphor would be the difference from formal promissary marriage ("amero") as we know it and common-law marriage which recognizes a man and a woman living together for 7 years as married (Euro). The creation of the Euro could be adequately be likened to the common currency of the US at the inception of the US and the creation of a national currency some 200 years ago.

With the combined forces of US fundamentalist national pride and the fact that we're the big guy on the block obviates the rise of the Amero any time in the next 50 years. I think the creation of the Amero is as likely as the founder of the RNA being elected to congress.

Foggetaboutit

ps: that white-house crap about the Security and Prosperity Partnership? It's vaccuous propoganda from them that has no grit.